4/5/18: Jokes on me because I went to poly eventually. And my O level grade missed NYJC by 1 point.
Today, a lecturer came from temasek poly to talk abt DPA. Actually, while others doze off, im wide awake listening to every word, and was kind of influenced to go poly. But after researching several poly in SG and reading forums advices, seems like JC is my only choice for school after my O’s , and given my “awesome” results, how far can i go?
I plan to get into good JC like Nanyang. Why i chose nanyang? Its a good JC with low COP, which means smart ppl all go to tat sch, and it will have good lecturers! Good lecturers means i wont have to tio shyt teachers like ms toh, who teach rubbish and wrong facts. COP of 9 points, average A2 per subject minus cca 1 point… also, nanyang in serangoon, simply means its near me house
I dont really have confidence getting into nanyang jc… so i may try direct school admission? Need portfolio interview and good end of year- highly inpossible with shyt teacher like ms toh. No offence, but 90% of her students find her lousy and cant teach, and probably 40% of her student hope she fail. What is with moe, giving struggling pure sciencw student a noob trainee? MOE is bias i guess? I see those top branded school oso no trainee, why my school so many arh?
must prepare my portfolio today onwards, towards my dream to be oncologist *hopefully* or radiologist (:
I plan to get into good JC like Nanyang. Why i chose nanyang? Its a good JC with low COP, which means smart ppl all go to tat sch, and it will have good lecturers! Good lecturers means i wont have to tio shyt teachers like ms toh, who teach rubbish and wrong facts. COP of 9 points, average A2 per subject minus cca 1 point… also, nanyang in serangoon, simply means its near me house
I dont really have confidence getting into nanyang jc… so i may try direct school admission? Need portfolio interview and good end of year- highly inpossible with shyt teacher like ms toh. No offence, but 90% of her students find her lousy and cant teach, and probably 40% of her student hope she fail. What is with moe, giving struggling pure sciencw student a noob trainee? MOE is bias i guess? I see those top branded school oso no trainee, why my school so many arh?
must prepare my portfolio today onwards, towards my dream to be oncologist *hopefully* or radiologist (:
